How Social Identities May Affect Policymaking

Social identity theory explains how people's behavior is influenced by their group identities and intergroup relationships. It has been applied in a variety of fields but has not yet been fully integrated into theories of the policy process, which are primarily based on assumptions about the behavior of policy actors.

A recent paper proposes the inclusion of the social identity theory in the policy process in order to better understand the dynamics of policy-making, including the conditions under which identities become important, the mechanisms behind identification with policy-related groups, and the influence of identities on policy preferences and decision-making.

Social identity theory

Social identity theory was developed by Henri Tajfel in 1974 and suggests that individuals tend to categorize themselves and others in order to better understand the world around them. Social groups, which consist of two or more people who define themselves as members of the group and share a common social identification, are an important reference for this categorization.

Social identification refers to a person's identification with a social group and includes three components: cognitive, evaluative, and affective. When an individual identifies with a group, they take on the social identity associated with that group and distinguish themselves from others through this categorization. Two main motivations drive individuals to identify with groups: the desire for sameness and the desire for distinctiveness.

Tajfel and his student, John Turner, further developed the theory into the "Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior," which posits that individuals act in favor of their own social group in order to achieve a benefit for it. This leads to biases in favor of the in-group over the out-group, which affects not only evaluative but also distributional and perceptual dimensions.

A related theory of self-categorization (SCT) suggests that individuals categorize themselves on different levels, including a personal level, a group level, and a superordinate level, and that the salience of a social identity in a given context is influenced by its accessibility and fit.

Social identity theory has been applied in a variety of fields, but has not yet been fully integrated into theories of the policy process. But recent research proposes the inclusion of the social identity approach in the policy process in order to better understand the dynamics of policymaking on three levels as described below.

1. The microlevel of social identities in the policy process

Social identities play a role in the policy process at the micro level by influencing the attitudes and behavior of policy actors. The strength and salience of an actor's social identity can affect their behavior in policy decision-making. Factors such as the fit of the identity with the policy issue at hand, the perceived differences between social groups, the strength of the identity, and the context of the policy issue can all influence the salience of a social identity and, in turn, shape an actor's behavior. Actors may also have multiple social identities that can conflict with one another, and the interrelation of these identities can guide their behavior in the policy process.

2. The mesolevel of social identities in the policy process

At the mesolevel of the policy process, social identities can influence collective action among individual policy actors as part of social groups. When individual policy actors have overlapping or shared social identities, they are more likely to engage in collective action. Collective action among social groups is more likely when there is frequent contact between group leaders and when the group leaders have a strong superordinate identity compared to their subordinate identities. This suggests that social identities can shape the dynamics and actions of policy actors at the group level.

3. The macrolevel of social identities in the policy process

On a macrolevel of analysis in the policy process, social identities can manifest in five broader forms: local identities based on geography and political decision levels, sectoral identities related to policy expertise, organizational identities such as partisan or interest group identities, demographic identities based on characteristics such as age or gender, and informal identities within networks and other social groups. These identities can shape views on specific policies and affect the preferences of policy actors. At the macrolevel, researchers can identify which social identities are relevant for specific issues and how political systems and venues address certain identities. However, combining the macrolevel with micro- and mesolevel analysis and methods is necessary to fully understand the role of social identities in the policy process.

Identity Essential Reads

The Existential Crisis of Digital Identity

Your Self-Story Is a Lie

Conclusion

The integration of social identity theory into policy process research can provide new insights into the behavior and preferences of policy actors in decision-making processes. Different forms of identification can influence an individual's organizational citizenship behavior, and, in the context of policy-making, the behavior of policy actors in contributing to group performance and making decisions that are beneficial to the group. Social identity theory can also be applied to the policy process at the macrolevel to examine how political systems and venues address certain social identities and how identity-based political parties and interest groups influence policy outcomes.