Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance: True Lies and False Truths

When meanings of words are deviously twisted, we are unsettled and vulnerable.

Key points

  • The psychological experience of cognitive dissonance is experienced when contradictory words, percepts and beliefs are simultaneously presented.
  • People experiencing cognitive dissonance feel anxious and threatened, increasingly mistrustful and vulnerable to authoritarian influences.
  • If our senses of reality are placed in doubt or dismissed as invalid by authority figures, we become uncertain of our legitimacy and security.

Once upon a time, the words we used had dependable and agreed-upon meanings. Words describing people, events, beliefs, acts, and other experiences were either facts and truths or fictions and falsehoods.

Lately, it’s as if we’re living in never-never land, where the meanings of words have become misleading and confusing, sometimes by design. Facts can be replaced by whims of fancy and fiction, bearing little relation to reality. True statements have to compete with lies, distortions, or conspiracy theories for public acceptance.

As a result, people are increasingly unsure of what to believe. The simultaneous occurrence in an individual of contradictory thoughts and beliefs is referred to as cognitive dissonance. Believing that something stated or written is factual when it really has a contradictory meaning can have unsettling effects.

In addition to the cognitive dissonance we are experiencing, “True Lies” and “False Truths” are oxymorons that we frequently hear during political and public health conflicts we are experiencing. When the boundaries between reality and fantasy are blurred, people can be confused, anxious, or mistrustful.

This, however, is not a novel experience in human history. It was satirized in 1879 by Gilbert and Sullivan in the song “Things are Seldom as They Seem” in their comic operetta “The Pirates of Penzance.” G & S used comedy as a dramatic device, but their point was that using confusing language to deceive is serious business and anything but comical.

A hideous example of deceptive language is the infamous sign at the entrance to the Auschwitz Death Camp, where the words that welcomed arriving Jewish and other victims were “Arbet Macht Frei” (“Work Will Set You Free”). The Nazis treacherously misused soft words to camouflage cruel meanings.

A U.S. Congressional bill put forth in 1954 used the word “Emancipation” of Chippewa and other Native American tribes. The word implied increased rights and freedoms as Americans. Still, the fine print meant “termination” of Treaties, loss of their lands, and “relocation” of Native Americans from their ancestral lands to cities.

America’s sorry history of racism and slavery involves innumerable duplicitous statements and writings by white politicians expressing attacks couched in words of caring and benevolence.

This sinister communication style was chillingly illustrated in George Orwell's prophetic novel 1984 (published in 1949), a metaphoric warning about a repressive political and social system in a future society. He wrote it after World War 2, during which he witnessed the devious use of language in authoritarian regimes like Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan.

The government Orwell described imposed oppressive controls on its citizens, but it implied caring and empathy. He coined the terms “doublethink” and “doublespeak” to illustrate familiar words being supplanted by contradictory meanings, conveying exactly their opposite intent. The propaganda office was called the “Ministry of Truth,” a camouflage for “Ministry of Disinformation.” Its proclaimed tenets of Truth (lies) declared that freedom was equivalent to slavery, war was love, and ignorance became strength.

These double meanings sowed confusion and fear in the population. Cruelty hid in the guise of caring, freedoms were drastically curtailed, and dire punishments were enforced. Leaders demanded and threatened, police henchmen subdued and arrested, and citizens were frightened and cowed.

We’ve seen examples of “doublespeak” here in the United States, where words have been used to express inherent contradictions. Vivid events which we witnessed in person or on screens, like the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol, or the knee on the neck of George Floyd, were clarified in benign or beneficial terms. The attacks of hundreds of angry men (mostly) were likened by some politicians to “tourism,” The raging mob was described by Donald Trump as “good, patriotic, and loving” people, just as he had described attackers in Charleston. The police actions which killed Floyd were “following procedure” and “protective.”

Factual scientific data have been declared “fake news.” The recent federal election has been called “fixed, fraudulent, or rigged,” despite being deemed fair and ratified by independent judicial authorities. Effective vaccines have been called dangerous and toxic.

Official lies that are stated assertively and repeatedly gain the credibility of many angry people with the status quo. They are often believed by those dissatisfied with their lives and who feel powerless and socially disconnected. They seek meaning in their lives and want clear answers to nuanced complexities, but they base their realities on misinformation, delusions, and lies.

Bizarre and toxic conspiracy theories flourish in this particular soil of frustration, dissatisfaction, and anger. Elaborate interpretations are concocted and believed by zealots, and their preconceived beliefs and biases give them a new sense of meaning in their lives.

The brilliant filmmaker and chronicler of historical events, Ken Burns, has called this “The Human Virus of Lying and Disinformation.” It is as toxic and lethal as the coronavirus and human hatreds of “the other.”

Question: What happens when “doublethink” and “doublespeak” besiege citizens with words and phrases filled with deceitful ambiguities and deliberate pairings of misleading words that enter the common vernacular?

Answer: When citizens are uncertain of truth and untruth, they become unnerved and anxious, mistrustful of democratic institutions, insecure about safety, and especially vulnerable to lies, conspiracy theories, and the entreaties of demagoguery, populism, and authoritarianism.

I shudder at this possible outcome here.

advertisement
More from Saul Levine M.D.
More from Psychology Today