Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

First Impressions

How to Overcome a Poor First Impression

The best way to update your image.

Key points

  • Competence, sociability, and morality impact impression formation differently.
  • Information about morality is viewed as more revealing of interpersonal intentions, causing greater change in impression.
  • Negative impressions improve more significantly with positive information about morality versus sociability.

Many of us have been there: Faced with an opportunity to make a great impression, personally or professionally, we say or do the wrong thing and feel like we blew it. Whether in a job interview or on a first date, we wonder if we can have a “do-over.” According to research, the answer is yes.

Jill Wellington/Pixabay
Source: Jill Wellington/Pixabay

Character Qualities Count

Marco Brambilla et al. (2019) examined the impact of different types of information about personality and character on the making and updating of first impressions.[i] They note that competence, sociability, and morality impact impression formation differently, but morality establishes the primary basis for the way we evaluate other people. Investigating whether we update our impressions of others by all three factors equally, they had study participants revise their impressions of a person upon receiving new and inconsistent information in all three realms. They found that information about morality was viewed as more revealing of interpersonal intentions, causing a greater change in impression than when presented with new information about competence or sociability.

Regarding negative impressions, Brambilla et al. found that immoral people are viewed more negatively than people who are unsociable. Negative impressions, however, improved more significantly when positive information about morality, versus sociability, was added to previous negative qualities. They also noted that in contrast, impressions about someone deteriorated when subjects who had originally learned about positive qualities subsequently learned about negative moral (versus sociability) qualities.

What mediates this impression change? Brambilla et al. concluded that morality is viewed as more informative of a person’s intentions because establishing intentions is seen as a key component of impression formation.

Character Over Competence

More recently, Andrew Luttrell et al. (2022) examined how subsequent information can alter first impressions in a job interview context.[ii] They tested the impact of the Moral Primacy Model, which proposes that as we form impressions of others over time, information about a person’s morality is more significant than information about competence or sociability. Testing this model in a job interview setting, they found that despite planning to prioritize competence over morality when making a hiring decision, impressions changed more significantly upon receipt of new information about a subject's immorality, rather than incompetence. Interestingly, when the new information about the subject was positive, they did not find a moral primacy effect.

Morality Matters

Taken together, research supports the reality that personally or professionally, morality matters. In all cases, information about morality drives impression management both initially, and over time. So despite the accuracy or inaccuracy of first impressions, especially in domains such as sociability and competence, learning about morality-related character traits such as honor and integrity can always enhance first impressions—which are usually not as bad as we think in the first place.

References

[i] Brambilla, Marco, Luciana Carraro, Luigi Castelli, and Simona Sacchi. 2019. “Changing Impressions: Moral Character Dominates Impression Updating.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 82 (May): 64–73. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.003.

[ii] Luttrell, Andrew, Simona Sacchi, and Marco Brambilla. 2022. “Changing Impressions in Competence-Oriented Domains: The Primacy of Morality Endures.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 98 (January). doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104246.

advertisement
More from Wendy L. Patrick, J.D., M.Div., Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today