Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Empathy: A Human Construct Borrowed by AI
Understanding AI-based empathy requires a closer look at ourselves.
Updated October 9, 2023 Reviewed by Kaja Perina
![Image by Dee from Pixabay. Image by Dee from Pixabay.](https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/styles/article_inline_half_caption/public/field_blog_entry_images/2023-10/EmpathyEye.jpg?itok=dkJgZQCT)
Empathy, a cornerstone of human interaction, is an enigmatic construct. It is a rich tapestry of genuine concern, social expectation, and perfunctory exchanges. Within this complexity, we find empathy at a curious crossroads with artificial intelligence (AI).
The incongruous idea of machine-driven empathy beckons examination. Is AI capable of 'borrowing' what fundamentally defines human social experience? Let's delve into the question of what artificial empathy (AE) means, how it works, and its implications for the future of human-machine interactions.
Defining Empathy: Navigating Genuine Concern and Social Constructs
Empathy is both an emotional and cognitive process. It encapsulates our capacity to recognize, understand, and even vicariously experience the emotions of another. At its deepest level, it’s a bridge between souls, fostering a sense of shared human experience. However, its manifestation isn't always so noble or profound.
We recognize its operation on multiple levels:
- Cognitive Empathy: This involves the intellectual ability to perceive and understand someone else's emotions. It's akin to placing oneself in another's shoes, not to feel their emotions but to comprehend them.
- Emotional Empathy: This is the visceral and emotional response we have to another's feelings. It's more than understanding—it's feeling alongside them.
- Compassionate Empathy: Going a step further, compassionate empathy involves both understanding and feeling another's emotion, coupled with a desire to help or alleviate any distress.
Yet, the waters of empathy are sometimes muddied by societal norms and expectations, leading to what might be considered 'contrived empathy.' This brand of empathy isn't necessarily disingenuous, but it's modulated, shaped by societal pressures and the need for social cohesion or personal gain. A classic illustration is the age-old trope of a politician kissing a baby: The act, though seemingly affectionate and empathetic, is more strategic than genuine, designed to cultivate an image of warmth and relatability.
In various social scenarios, this contrived empathy emerges as a tool—a social construct. Its aim isn't always to genuinely connect or console but to maintain a facade, fulfill a societal expectation, or further personal agendas. It’s a dance on the tightrope that borders genuine concern and societal necessity.
Therefore, while empathy, in its purest form, is a profound human experience, its manifestations can vary widely. From genuine emotional connections to calculated displays for societal benefit, empathy is multifaceted and deeply intertwined with both our innate human nature and the societal structures we navigate.
AI and the Facade of Empathy
AI, particularly conversational agents like ChatGPT, exhibit what can be called 'artificial empathy.' Here, algorithms generate responses based on data and predictive modeling to simulate empathetic interactions. For instance, an AI chatbot might respond with "I'm sorry you're feeling this way" upon detecting negative sentiment in a user's text. This isn't empathy in the human sense, as the machine lacks cognitive and emotional faculties. It's more akin to a performance, algorithmically generated to foster smoother human-machine interaction. However, this expression can have a powerful emotional impact and may result in important tools for engagement, even when contrived.
The Mechanics of Artificial Empathy
Artificial empathy operates on a utilitarian axis; it serves a functional purpose, often designed to optimize user engagement or social context. It involves Natural Language Processing (NLP), sentiment analysis, and often, complex neural networks trained on massive datasets. This capability does not originate from an innate machine 'understanding' but from intricate algorithms trained to predict and produce socially appropriate responses.
Ownership and Borrowership: A Complex Interplay
While it may be tempting to view AI's foray into empathy as an intrusion into an exclusively human domain, this perspective oversimplifies the dynamics at play. AI is an artifact of human ingenuity, a tool created to serve specific needs. Its 'borrowing' of empathy is an extension of its design objectives, most often aimed at enhancing its utility in human-centered tasks. Therefore, in the grand architecture of empathy, AI is a tenant, not a proprietor.
A Case in Point: Empathy in Clinical Settings
The recent convergence of AI and healthcare is a compelling narrative, especially when examining a study comparing physician and ChatGPT responses. Surprisingly, many patients seemed to favor the AI's 'empathetic' replies over human clinicians. This discrepancy might arise from ChatGPT's ability to craft instant, conversational answers, while physicians, molded by rigorous clinical training and time constraints, offer more succinct, actionable advice. However, it's crucial to distinguish between conversational fluency and actionable medical counsel. The rapid, data-driven capabilities of AI chatbots might seem attentive, but the clinical judgment of physicians is irreplaceable. The study underscores the potential role of AI as a complementary tool in healthcare, driving effective and compelling dialogues that may enhance care.
A Hug: Real, Imagined or Contrived
Artificial empathy remains a concept that is, at its core, a derivative of its human archetype. It serves pragmatic ends, facilitated by increasingly sophisticated algorithms. However, it's important to remember that this technology borrows from the human playbook. It presents a simulacrum of empathy, effective yet devoid of the emotional and cognitive complexities that make human empathy a cornerstone of our social existence. But that contrived reality—often similar to our sincere and contrived social interactions—can manifest in a very real and powerful way. And the emergence of AI and GPT makes this even more real.
By navigating this frontier with a keen awareness of these complexities, we may find that artificial empathy, though borrowed, can serve as a valuable adjunct to human interaction, without muddying the intricate waters of what makes us fundamentally human.