Disability activists have, correctly, pointed out that it is possible to be wrong about any individual's “cognitive abilities” and future prospects for growth and development. But does this support for the conclusion that the Ashley Treatment is always, and everywhere, wrong?
Disability activists have, correctly, pointed out that it is possible to be wrong about any individual's “cognitive abilities” and future prospects for growth and development. But does this support for the conclusion that the Ashley Treatment is always, and everywhere, wrong?