Relationships
The Difference Between Toxic and Abusive Relationships
Overuse of the word toxic downplays the severity of toxic relationships.
Updated July 26, 2024 Reviewed by Margaret Foley
Key points
- The major differences between toxic and abusive are intentionality, patterns, and the degree of harm.
- An abusive relationship shows a pattern of power and control, often escalating to physical or emotional harm.
- While both can be harmful, all abusive relationships are toxic, but not all toxic relationships are abusive.
In recent years, the term "toxic" has become increasingly overused in popular culture and media, often applied loosely to describe any negative or challenging relationship dynamics. This overuse contributes to a dilution of its true meaning, often downplaying the severity of unhealthy or even abusive relationships. By labeling every difficult relationship as "toxic," we risk trivializing the profound impact of genuinely harmful behaviors.
Some of the behaviors referred to as "toxic" are actually normal. It's important to differentiate between occasional conflicts or disagreements—which are natural in any relationship—and patterns of behavior that actively undermine emotional well-being and safety. An example of this is the use of the word "toxic" to describe disagreements or personality conflicts. Much as not all differences of opinion are gaslighting, not every person you do not get along with is toxic. By using the term more discerningly, we can create a clearer understanding of unhealthy relationship dynamics and better support those who may be experiencing genuine harm.
What is a toxic relationship?
A toxic relationship is characterized by negative patterns of behavior and communication that undermine the well-being and happiness of one or both partners. It often involves manipulation, lack of respect for boundaries, and emotional or psychological harm, creating a consistently stressful and damaging environment. While still dysfunctional and even harmful, toxic behaviors can exist without the presence of abuse.
In a toxic relationship, one partner might constantly dismiss the other's accomplishments, leading to diminished self-esteem over time. Another example could involve one partner consistently disregarding the other's feelings and needs, prioritizing their own desires without regard for mutual respect or compromise.
How does this differ from an abusive relationship?
Many may look at the above examples and insist that they are abusive. And they may not necessarily be wrong, as toxic and abusive behaviors often exist on a spectrum, from situational to severe. Occasional toxicity or abuse can sometimes be referred to as situational couple violence, which is considered to be different from ongoing coercive control as a form of domestic abuse (Nielsen et al., 2015). (It should be noted that this distinction does not downplay the severity of any form of abuse, nor does it attempt to categorize any abuse as "less than" or "small.")
In contrast, abusive behaviors involve a deliberate intent to control, dominate, or harm the other person physically, emotionally, or psychologically. Toxic and abusive behaviors can indeed be subjective to some extent, as individual perceptions and cultural norms may influence how behaviors are interpreted. What one person considers toxic or abusive may differ from another's perspective, especially in cases where emotional manipulation or control tactics are subtle or normalized within a particular relationship or community. However, there are generally recognized patterns and characteristics that distinguish toxic behaviors (such as criticism, lack of or very poor communication, or some forms of manipulation) from abusive behaviors (including physical violence or threats of violence, severe emotional manipulation, post-separation abuse, or coercive control). While subjectivity can play a role in interpretation, certain behaviors are universally understood as harmful and damaging within relationships (Nielsen et al., 2015).
It's important to remember that both can be harmful. Research has repeatedly shown that maltreatment does not need to be severely abusive, nor does it need to be physical in order to cause lasting harm (Hart et al., 1996). In fact, emotional and psychological harm has been shown to have greater effects on the developing brain of younger people, pointing to the critical importance of experiences of relationships during formative years and how these experiences can shape our future relationships (Heim et al., 2013).
Furthermore, toxic relationships can absolutely escalate into abuse in some cases, especially if left unaddressed or unacknowledged. What can begin as forms of toxicity, such as emotional manipulation or controlling behaviors, can escalate into more overt abuse. For example, a partner who initially criticizes their significant other's opinions or choices may eventually resort to more severe forms of emotional abuse, like constant demeaning remarks or threats. Similarly, controlling behaviors, often masked as insecurity or jealousy, can progress into isolating a partner from friends and family, becoming a form of coercive control where one partner exerts dominance over every aspect of the other's life (Dichter et al., 2018).
The escalation from toxicity to abuse often occurs gradually, making it challenging for those involved to recognize the severity of the situation while they are in it. Many, especially those who grew up in unhealthy or abusive environments, may normalize the toxic behaviors they are experiencing (Heim et al., 2013). Additionally, societal and cultural factors may play a role by minimizing or even dismissing early warning signs.
If you or someone you know is in an abusive relationship, it’s important to seek help. Look for a therapist who understands relationship dynamics, including abuse. National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233. To find a therapist, visit the Psychology Today Therapy Directory.
References
Hart SN, Brassard MR, Karlson HC. (1996). Psychological maltreatment. In: Briere JN, Berliner LA, Bulkley J, Jenny CA, Reid TA, editors. The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;. pp. 72–89.
Heim CM, Mayberg HS, Mletzko T, Nemeroff CB, Pruessner JC. (2013). Decreased cortical representation of genital somatosensory field after childhood sexual abuse. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;170(6):616–623.
Fogleman C. D. (2024). The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture. Family Medicine, 56(1), 58–59. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.486706
Dichter, M. E., Thomas, K. A., Crits-Christoph, P., Ogden, S. N., & Rhodes, K. V. (2018). Coercive Control in Intimate Partner Violence: Relationship with Women's Experience of Violence, Use of Violence, and Danger. Psychology of violence, 8(5), 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000158
Nielsen SK, Hardesty JL, Raffaelli M. (2015). Exploring variations within situational couple violence and comparisons with coercive controlling violence and no violence/no control.