Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Career

Unlocking Employee Happiness and Engagement with Hybrid Work

How hybrid work policies boost employee satisfaction and engagement.

Key points

  • When employees help shape their hybrid work schedules, engagement goes up, boosting productivity.
  • Organizations that offer flexible work options see significantly higher employee retention and satisfaction.
  • Leaders need to overcome biases against hybrid work to adopt effective, team-driven policies.
  • The majority of employees now view remote flexibility as essential, influencing job selection and retention.
Andrea Piacquadio/pexels
Source: Andrea Piacquadio/pexels

Imagine a world where each morning, you wake up knowing your work schedule fits perfectly with your life's rhythm. This is not a distant utopia; it's a practical reality within grasp.

Recent surveys by Boston Consulting Group and Gallup point to a profound finding: when teams have a say in their hybrid work policy, employee satisfaction and engagement soar.

Choice Offers the Key to Be Engaged With Hybrid Work

The Boston Consulting Group's report unveils a critical disconnect in many organizations, highlighting a significant issue in the modern workplace. A staggering 62 percent of employees feel voiceless regarding their work model policy, indicating a severe lack of agency. This isn't just a minor inconvenience; it's a major source of dissatisfaction, deeply impacting employee morale and commitment.

The data reveals a significant disparity: 24 percent of employees are unhappy when their work location is dictated by the company, a stark contrast to the 14 percent if the manager decides and a mere 6 percent dissatisfaction rate when teams are empowered to make this decision. This contrast is not just a set of figures; it represents a fundamental truth about human psychology in the workplace. Proximity to decision-making is strongly correlated with contentment, indicating that employees value the feeling of control over their work environment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered the landscape of work, turning remote work from an exception to a normative model. This shift isn't merely a logistical change; it's a transformation that challenges traditional notions of work and management.

In this new era, leaders must recognize the symbolic significance of flexible work policies. These decisions reflect the organization's core values, particularly its commitment to trust and accountability. In a work culture where decisions are imposed, often without consideration for individual needs, engagement and productivity are likely to falter. However, when employees are part of the decision-making process, it not only boosts their satisfaction but also reflects an organizational culture that values its workforce as key stakeholders.

The implications of these findings are profound, especially when considering the current and future job market. According to the Boston Consulting Group survey, an overwhelming majority of respondents—nine out of ten—consider flexible work options a critical factor in their job selection process. This statistic is a clear indicator of the changing priorities in the workforce.

Moreover, the survey sheds light on a worrying trend for employers: dissatisfaction with work models significantly increases the likelihood of employees leaving their jobs. Those who are unhappy with their flexible work options are more than 2.5 times more likely to consider quitting within the next year. This data isn't just a cautionary tale; it's a clarion call for organizations to rethink their approach to work flexibility.

The Power of Being Engaged With Hybrid Work

Gallup's research offers crucial insights into the dynamics of employee engagement in the context of hybrid work models. Their findings serve as a vital complement to the earlier narrative about employee satisfaction and decision-making.

According to Gallup, when teams are involved in collaboratively setting their hybrid schedules, engagement levels reach an impressive peak of 46 percent. This statistic represents a significant insight into employee morale and productivity. When individuals have a say in their work schedules, they feel more valued and empowered, leading to higher levels of engagement.

The difference in engagement levels becomes even more pronounced when compared to other decision-making models. For instance, when individuals make these decisions independently, the engagement rate stands at 41 percent. While this is still a commendable figure, it falls short of the engagement achieved through collective decision-making.

The most striking contrast is seen when top leadership dictates hybrid work schedules, resulting in a notably lower engagement rate of 34 percent. This sharp drop-off highlights a fundamental truth about the modern workforce: employees crave not only flexibility but also collaborative decision-making. They desire a work environment where their voices are heard and their preferences are considered.

This craving for a sense of control and collaboration extends beyond mere scheduling preferences. As noted, Gallup's research suggests that a vast majority of remote-capable employees express a preference for some degree of remote work flexibility. This overwhelming majority underscores the fact that remote work, once considered an exception, has now become a widespread expectation in the modern workplace.

The majority of these employees favor a hybrid model, blending the benefits of remote and in-office work. This apparent preference for hybrid work illustrates a desire for a balanced approach, one that offers the autonomy of remote work while retaining the structure and community of in-office interactions.

The implications of these preferences are profound, especially in terms of employee retention. Gallup's findings indicate that three in ten hybrid workers are extremely likely to leave their organization if they are not offered at least some degree of remote flexibility.

In the current job market, where talent retention is more crucial than ever, offering remote flexibility is not just a perk; it’s a strategic necessity. Organizations that fail to adapt to these changing preferences risk losing valuable talent.

For example, consider the company Atlassian. They allow their teams the flexibility to decide when to come to the office. Their own surveys find that 92 percent of their employees say their flexible distributed work policy allows them to do their best work, and 91 percent report it’s an important reason why they stay at Atlassian.

Teams generally meet together in the office every several months, focusing on social bonding activities; Atlassian reports that such in-person gatherings boost by 27 percent a sense of connection between team members. This boost lasts 4-5 months, with the biggest boost for new hires.

Conclusion

The path to a more satisfied and engaged workforce in the hybrid work era is clear. Give teams the reins to decide their work policies. This approach is not just about appeasing employees; it's a strategic imperative. In a world where talent is the most valuable currency, organizations that empower their employees will thrive. The choice is yours: cling to outdated models or embrace a future where your team's satisfaction and engagement are the cornerstones of your success.

A version of this post also appears on disasteravoidanceexperts.com.

References

Lovich, D., Sargeant, R. (2023, August 15). Making Flexible Working Models Work. BCG. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/flexible-working-models

Wigert, B., Harter, J., Reich, A., Agrawal, S. (2023, October 9). The Future of the Office Has Arrived: It's Hybrid. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/511994/future-office-arrived-hybrid.as…

Kurjenniemi, J., Ryti, N. (2020). Designing remote employee experience in knowledge work to attract talent. Theseus. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/355201

advertisement
More from Gleb Tsipursky Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today