Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Therapy

How to Increase Effectiveness in Psychotherapy Practice

Emphasizing trust, empathy, and understanding can boost effectiveness.

Key points

  • Trust, empathy, and mutual understanding is foundational for effective therapy outcomes.
  • How patients perceive and believe in the treatment process shapes their engagement and therapy results.
  • Therapists need to adapt and combine techniques and strategies to meet the unique needs of each patient.

The contextual model of psychotherapy is a conceptual framework that emphasizes the importance of various factors in the effectiveness of psychotherapy. This model was primarily developed by Bruce E. Wampold and detailed in his book "The Great Psychotherapy Debate," (2001). At the heart of the contextual model is the belief that the effectiveness of psychotherapy emerges from a combination of intertwined elements, rather than a single method (Wampold & Imel, 2015). The model underlines three vital pathways through which therapy impacts patients:

Psychotherapy has experienced considerable evolution, enriched by diverse theories and this model has been pivotal in identifying the significance of common factors in psychotherapy and offering a refined understanding of therapeutic effectiveness (Wampold, 2015.) This has been researched and explored successfully through research such as that of DR Vitry (2021) at SYPRENE in Paris, France. I want to not only delineate the fundamental principles of the contextual model but also scrutinize the impact of these common factors on the outcomes of psychotherapy.

Impact and Practice

The focus on common factors is on transforming the practice of psychotherapy, directing attention to the subtleties, of the therapeutic process, emphasizing the importance of the therapeutic relationship, cultural sensitivity, and the need for flexible, patient-centred approaches. This understanding is crucial not only for the effective practice of psychotherapy but also for the continued advancement and relevance of the field. This shift should broaden our focus beyond specific techniques, considering with greater sensitivity and focus, elements like the therapeutic relationship, patient expectations (Nardone and Portelli, 2007; Robson, 2023), and cultural backgrounds. Knowledge of the pivotal role of the therapeutic relationship in successful outcomes asks us to prioritize building trust, empathy, and understanding. This relationship forms the backbone of therapy, providing a secure base for exploring and addressing psychological issues. A strong therapeutic alliance is correlated with better patient engagement, reduced dropout rates, and more effective treatment outcomes (Wampold, 2001).

Enhancing Therapist Self-Reflection and Development

Awareness of therapist effects — how the therapist's personality, skills, and behaviours impact therapy — should prompt continual professional growth and self-reflection in the field. Clinicians are encouraged to regularly evaluate and hone their skills, ensuring that their approach remains effective and responsive to each patient's needs as with deliberate practice (Miller et al., 2020). Deliberate practice is a highly structured and focused approach to skill development, characterized by specific goals, continuous feedback, and a significant level of effort and concentration. It was popularized by psychologist K. Anders Ericsson, who studied how people become experts in their fields.

Key Elements of Deliberate Practice

  • Well-defined, Specific Goals: Deliberate practice involves working towards specific objectives that are designed to improve particular aspects of performance. These goals are not about merely engaging in an activity, but about improving specific components of the skill.
  • Concentration and Effort: It requires a high level of focus and is often mentally demanding. The practitioner must concentrate fully on the task, often pushing beyond their comfort zone.
  • Structured Approach: Unlike casual practice, deliberate practice is methodical and often involves a structured training regimen. This structure is usually designed by a teacher or coach who understands how to develop skills effectively.
  • Immediate Feedback: Regular and immediate feedback is crucial in deliberate practice. This feedback, whether from a coach, teacher, or self-assessment, helps the individual understand their progress and areas that need improvement.
  • Repetition With Refinement: It involves repeated performance of the skill, with adjustments made based on feedback. This cycle of execution, feedback, and refinement is key to mastering the skill.
  • Developing Specific Skills: Instead of general improvement, deliberate practice targets very specific areas for development, often breaking down complex skills into smaller, more manageable components.
  • Outside Comfort Zone: It typically involves practising at the edge of one’s abilities. The challenge is high enough to stretch the individual's skills, but not so high as to be unattainable.
  • Long-Term Commitment: Mastery through deliberate practice is a long-term process. It requires sustained effort over a significant period, often involving many hours of practice (Vitry, 2020).

Significance in the Field of Psychotherapy

Recognizing the importance of common factors supports a more adaptive and integrative approach to therapy, clinicians are better equipped to blend different methodologies and techniques, tailoring their approach to best fit the individual needs of their patients alongside deliberate practice. The emphasis on common factors in psychotherapy is not merely a shift in treatment approach; it represents a fundamental evolution in the understanding of what makes therapy effective and where we should place our focus.

The paradigm shift in this approach:

  • Challenges the notion that specific treatment models or techniques are universally superior, instead highlighting the importance of therapist qualities, the therapeutic alliance, and the treatment context.
  • This aligns with the growing body of research emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive care in therapy.
  • Reflects a move towards more evidence-based practices, where decisions are informed by the latest research and tailored to individual patient needs.

The Role of Expectations

Expectations hold substantial sway over human behaviour and play a significant role in psychotherapy and medicine (Kirsch, 2012). The expectation effect can be used to influence patients' perceptions of treatment and their problems, (Frank, 1973). Nurturing optimistic expectations and meaningfully realistic expectations of change, through the clinical dialogue, (Gibson, 2022) and a coherent articulation of the problem/disorder and the proposed treatment further augments the effectiveness of the therapy. While we should emphasise the importance and centrality of specific techniques that can leverage these common factors, their success is facilitated by the creation of positive expectations and the encouragement of beneficial behaviours (Wampold, 2001). This challenges the traditional belief in the supremacy of specific techniques as the primary catalysts for change, proposing instead a more comprehensive approach to therapy (Nardone and Portelli, 2007). Empathy or feeling empathised emerges as a critical element in psychotherapy, with studies showing its strong association with positive treatment outcomes (Elliott et al., 2011). The therapist's ability to empathize profoundly reinforces the therapeutic alliance and boosts the overall success of the therapy, but real empathy is experienced most profoundly when we strike the right chords with patients in our clinical dialogue and also when the effects of therapy and desired change are felt in patients' real lives, only then can patients that we truly understand their predicament (Gibson, 2022; Nardone and Balbi, 2008)

Cultural Adaptation and Therapist Effect

The skills and personal qualities of therapists, (therapist effects) have a substantial impact on the results of therapy (Baldwin, Wampold, & Imel, 2007) and are trans-contextual, which challenges the belief that specific therapies are indispensable for certain disorders. This proposes instead that the effectiveness of psychotherapy is largely attributed to common factors over specific treatment methods (Wampold & Imel, 2015). It is also important to say that common factors can be dramatically enhanced, by effective therapeutic interactions that lean on relationship and communication (Gibson, 2022; Nardone, 2009; Vitry et al., 2021).

To find a therapist, visit the Psychology Today Therapy Directory.

References

Baldwin, S. A., Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2007). Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(6), 842-852.

Benish, S. G., Quintana, S., & Wampold, B. E. (2011). Culturally adapted psychotherapy and the legitimacy of myth: A direct-comparison meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(3), 279-289.

Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252-260.

Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 43-49.

Frank, J. D. (1973). Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gibson, P. (2023). Persuasion Principle. Strategic Persuasion. Strategic Science

Grégoire Vitry, Claude de Scorraille, Claudette Portelli, Michael F. Hoyt, Redundant Attempted Solutions: Operative Diagnoses and Strategic Interventions to Disrupt More of the Same, Journal of Systemic Therapies, 10.1521/jsyt.2021.40.4.12, 40, 4, (12-29), (2021).

Nardone, G. and Balbi, E. (2008). The Logic of Therapeutic Change. Karnac Books.

Nardone, G., & Portelli, C. (2005b). Knowing Through Changing. The Evolution of Brief Strategic Therapy. Crown House.

Nardone, G., & Salvini, A. (2007). The Strategic Dialogue. Karnac Publishing.

Robson, D. (2023). The Expectation Effect. Cannongate. UK.

Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270-277.

Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

advertisement
More from Padraic Gibson D.Psych
More from Psychology Today