Bias
Unpacking the Meghan and Harry Interview
The problems unearthed run deeper than racism alone.
Posted March 12, 2021 Reviewed by Matt Huston
Everyone is still talking about Oprah Winfrey's recent interview with Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
During the interview, the couple spoke to Oprah about the royal family, the media, issues of mental health, and racism. One of the biggest "bombshells" was when the duchess, who is the first multi-racial member of the modern royal family, revealed that Harry was asked by an unnamed family member "how dark" their son Archie's skin might be.
Buckingham Palace issued a statement in response to the interview, which included the comment: "The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately."
As a multi-racial woman with a black mother and white father, Meghan is seen by some as not "pure-blooded" enough. This hearkens back to the mythical concept of "blue blood" and royal purity.
But it's more than just racism.
For years, there has been relentless negative media coverage of Meghan. Much of this coverage has smacked of sexism, nationalism, and classism too.
Meghan has been accused of being "too bold," "too outspoken," and "too feminist." She has been criticized for such trivial crimes as crossing her legs, wearing dark nail polish, having hair extensions, wearing a one-shouldered dress or a short skirt, and for her penchant for black clothes. She was attacked on social media for closing her car door instead of allowing an aide to do so.
Meghan once wore a pair of trousers to a function and was attacked with the sexist trope, "Guess who wears the trousers in Prince Harry's relationship?" She has been accused of "bewitching" Harry and has been branded a "difficult woman" and a "diva" and dubbed "Duchess Difficult."
The notion of "impurity" extends to her having dated and married prior to her royal marriage. Mingled with ageism, she has been repeatedly referred to as the "divorced older woman." (She is only three years older than Harry.) Related labels ("the divorced American") have revealed nationalism too. (Of course, she wasn't the first divorced American to marry a member of the royal family.) Meghan's nationality appears to be a problem to some, with her being described as "too multicultural" and "too American."
With the class system still deeply entrenched in Britain, Meghan, a "commoner," has also been looked down on for her socioeconomic background. She had a relatively humble childhood, growing up in a middle-class part of Los Angeles, where her father worked as a cinematographer and her mother as a social worker. Tabloids tracked down her ancestors to enslaved people in Georgia. Meghan has been belittled for having worked as a waitress and an actress. She has been compared to "trailer trash" and accused of dragging Harry "down into the trash heap." Given the pre-wedding scandal involving her father, her family has been described as "dysfunctional."
Different types of prejudice often intersect and overlap with each other. In this case, the racism faced by the Duchess of Sussex overlaps with sexism, nationalism, and also classism, reflecting dated attitudes in the British press, the general public, and, it seems, some members of the royal family.