Human Communication: Connection and Disconnection

Human communication is an art and a science. Communication is a means to connect deeply yet it can also be a path fraught with miscommunication and adverse and unpredictable behavioural effects. In this complex dance of human interaction, each step, gesture, and moment of silence carries weight and meaning, shaping the fabric of our relationships and our mental health and well-being.

Communication theory gives us a map to better navigate the nuances of our daily exchanges. Blaise Pascal's observation about the power of words sets the tone for understanding the multi-layered nature of communication. He said that "words arranged differently have different meanings and meanings arranged differently can have different effects." Our "ordinary" communication is better seen as a symphony where words, their arrangement, tone, and context play pivotal roles in the construction of our reality and the quality of our relationships. Ludwig Wittgenstein cautioned us about the traps of language and invited us to use our linguistic tools wisely, to express ourselves rather than to ensnare ourselves. In their seminal work "The Pragmatics of Human Communication", Don Jackson, Paul Watzlawick, and Janet Bavelas provide us with five axioms or general rules, of communication. These rules form a framework for interpreting human interaction, emphasizing the importance of context, perception, and relational dynamics in communication. Understanding and applying these rules can lead to more effective and meaningful interactions These principles act as a scaffold for understanding how we interact. They are as follows:

1. The Impossibility of Not Communicating (The Rule of Inevitable Communication)

• What it means: Every behaviour communicates something, even inaction or silence.
• Implications: This rule highlights that we are always communicating, whether we intend to or not. In social situations, everything from our silence to our body language is sending a message to others.

2. The Content and Relationship Levels of Communication (The Rule of Digital and Analogical Modalities)

• What it means: Messages have two levels: the 'digital' content which is the literal message, and the 'analogical' aspect, which is the non-verbal context that surrounds the message.
• Implications: Misunderstandings often occur when the non-verbal context conflicts with the verbal message. It's important to be aware that how something is said can greatly affect the meaning of the words.

3. Punctuation of the Sequence of Events (The Rule of Interactional Punctuation)

• What it means: Communication is a continuous flow, and how individuals 'punctuate' or interpret these flows can lead to different understandings of the same interaction.
• Implications: Disagreements can arise when people interpret the sequence of events differently. Each person may see their own responses as reactions to the other's behaviour, rather than as actions that provoke a response.

4. The Rule of Complementary and Symmetrical Interchanges

• What it means: Interactions can be symmetrical (equal) or complementary (based on differences).
• Implications: Understanding whether an interaction is based on equality or difference can help clarify the dynamics of the relationship. For example, a symmetrical exchange might escalate competitiveness, while a complementary one could reinforce one person's dominance.

5. The Rule of Metacommunication

• What it means: All communication has a content level and a relationship level, and the latter is a form of metacommunication, or communication about communication.
• Implications: Problems in communication often stem from the relationship level, not the content. Recognizing and addressing this can prevent and resolve conflicts.

Clinical Effect

In therapeutic settings, these axioms or rules are not merely academic; they are practical tools that guide clinicians in their interactions with clients. The recognition of the inescapable nature of communication is essential in understanding the impact of every gesture, word, and silence within the therapeutic milieu. Understanding the paradoxes and contradictions that can occur in everyday communication allows us to navigate and negotiate mixed messages and misalignments in verbal and nonverbal communication. This can aid us in clarifying intentions and fostering empathy, which are the cornerstones of healthy relationships and understanding, but it also assists us in influencing and persuading others to undertake actions that may create the change they require.

Words and Meaning

We must remember that our words have the power to shape our world and our interactions with others. Communication should be the bridge that connects us, not the cage that confines us. There is no "not communicating'', and so every action, every inaction, is laden with messages, both apparent and implied. The inevitability of communication is evident in all social situations, including non-verbal cues and the context of interactions also serves to shape our perception of and reaction to the message so every interaction is multi-layered, with a significant component being the relationship signals that define how we should relate to one another beyond mere facts.

Relationships Essential Reads

Married to Two People: The Romantic Life of Widows

How to Tell If a Friend or Partner Is a Leaf, Tree, or Root

Relationships With Reality

An interactional approach to communication underscores that we are all participants in a pre-existing system of communication and acknowledges the reciprocal nature of communication, where behaviour is both a response and a stimulus within a cycle of relational interactions. The relationship aspect of communication is pivotal. It's often not the content of our communication that leads to conflict, but the discrepancies in interpretation and the relational signals that are misaligned. Communication theory allows us to see that each behaviour in an interaction serves as a response and a stimulus for the next move and affects both parties. It emphasizes the shared responsibility we have in communication. It also provides a comprehensive framework for understanding human interactions, shifting the focus in our clinical work from individual psychology to the dynamics of relationships, between ourselves, others and the world around us. It emphasizes the role of relationship dynamics and the reciprocal process of communication. I believe that this framework is critical in fields such as psychotherapy, conflict resolution, and the broader understanding of human behaviour.